ArticlePloS one2025
Cross-modal fusion of brain imaging and clinical data for Parkinson's disease progression prediction.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pathway Anchored Multimodal Clustering Reveals Circuit Level Signatures in Parkinsons Disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMachine learning shows great potential in science but struggles with complex, high-dimensional multi-omics data. PD progression is long, diagnosed mainly by clinical signs. This paper proposes a novel decision fusion method to improve the precision of the classification of progression of PD using imaging with clinical data.
methodsA Cross-Modal Fusion Prediction Model (CMFP) is proposed, with key steps that involve data preparation, modelling, and prediction. The data encompasses three modalities: clinical, DTI (diffusion tensor imaging), and DAT (dopamine transporter), with Lasso used for the selection of features. Individual modalities are classified using AdaBoost and the results are integrated into the new fusion strategy, CMF, to obtain a novel model. Finally, this model is used for predictions.
resultsThe predictive performance of CMFP on the progression of PD achieved an AUC of 77.91%. This represents improvements of 24.48%, 30.78%, and 32.7% in AUC compared to predictions solely with clinical data, DTI data and DAT data, respectively. The combined prediction of clinical and DTI data demonstrated statistical significance compared to predictions based solely on clinical data, with a p-value of 9.183e-4. Additionally, this method identified crucial brain regions and important clinical metrics associated with PD. It should be noted that using the DTI metric along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) to predict and evaluate the progression of PD has relatively more advantages compared to DTI-clinical fusion prediction. Among them, the ACC can increase by 3.85%.
conclusionThe results indicate that CMFP is effective, contributing to overcoming the limitations of low predictive performance in single-modal data and enhancing the accuracy of the PD progression predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.