Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41264636›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

How cortico-basal ganglia-thalamic subnetworks can shift decision policies to increase reward rate.

Jyotika Bahuguna, Timothy Verstynen, Jonathan E Rubin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jyotika BahugunaDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2858-5325
Timothy VerstynenDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4720-0336
Jonathan E RubinCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1513-1551

Funding

CRCNS: Decision dynamics in cortico-basal ganglia-thalamic networksR01DA059993 · NIDA · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI Jonathan E. Rubin, TIMOTHY D VERSTYNEN · 2023 to 2026
$1.3M
CRCNS Circuit-Level Mechanisms of Adaptive decision-makingR01DA053014 · NIDA · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI VERSTYNEN, TIMOTHY D · 2020 to 2022
$1.0M
CRCNS: Diverse effects of GABAergic inputs on a basal ganglia output centerR01NS125814 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GITTIS, ARYN HILARY, RUBIN, JONATHAN E. · 2021 to 2023
$957k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA053014NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA059993NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS125814
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All mammals exhibit flexible decision policies that depend, at least in part, on the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamic (CBGT) pathways. Yet understanding how the complex connectivity, dynamics, and plasticity of CBGT circuits translate into experience-dependent shifts of decision policies represents a longstanding challenge in neuroscience. Here we present the results of a computational approach to address this problem. Specifically, we simulated decisions during the early learning process driven by CBGT circuits under baseline, unrewarded conditions using a spiking neural network, and fit an evidence accumulation model to the resulting behavior. Using canonical correlation analysis, we then replicated the identification of three control ensembles (responsiveness, pliancy and choice) within CBGT circuits, with each of these subnetworks mapping to a specific configuration of the evidence accumulation process. We subsequently simulated learning in a simple two-choice task with one optimal (i.e., rewarded) target and found that, during early stages of learning, feedback-driven dopaminergic plasticity on cortico-striatal synapses effectively increases reward rate over time. The learning-related changes in the decision policy can be decomposed in terms of the contributions of each control ensemble, whose influence is driven by sequential reward prediction errors on individual trials. Our results provide a clear and simple mechanism for how dopaminergic plasticity shifts subnetworks within CBGT circuits so as to increase reward rate by strategically modulating how evidence is used to drive decisions.

Indexed as

Basal GangliaCerebral CortexDecision MakingModels, NeurologicalRewardThalamusAnimalsChoice BehaviorComputational BiologyComputer SimulationHumansLearningNerve NetNeural PathwaysNeuronal Plasticity

Identifiers

PMID41264636
PMCPMC12668618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.