ArticlePloS one2025
Multispecific antibodies: Bioanalytics for early-stage screening and characterization of mispairing profiles.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multispecific antibodies (MsAbs) enable the targeting of different epitopes, representing a strategy with enhanced therapeutic potential. However, the intracellular assembly of MsAbs is complex and generates unwanted mispaired species, imposing a significant burden on downstream processing and analytical characterization, thus increasing the overall timeline and cost of bioprocess development. The establishment of analytical tools to aid in the characterization and understanding of MsAb mispairing profiles at early-stage screenings is mandatory. Here, we implemented mass spectrometry (MS) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods to assess mispairing levels using several Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) clones producing a MsAb. Results showed that both methods are suitable to be explored in early-stage screenings enabling the identification of higher quality MsAb producer clones. Importantly, not only protein A-purified but also clarified samples can be analysed by the methods established, streamlining the characterization process and reducing costs and analysis time. Moreover, we evaluated the impact of different mispairing levels on antibody functionality by biophysical tools. Nano-Differential Scanning Fluorometry (nDSF) was used to record thermal stability profiles and Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) to infer on the binary interactions established with three different antigens, revealing distinct profiles between groups with higher and lower mispairing levels. Our work allowed the development and implementation of a mispairing analytical toolbox, critical for early-stage screening and deeper characterization of these complex biopharmaceuticals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.