ArticleJournal of adolescent and young adult oncology2026
Implementing a User-Centered Design to Develop a Web-Based Sperm Banking Decision Tool for Adolescent Males with Cancer.
Article in Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeApproximately half of male childhood cancer survivors experience treatment-related fertility impairment. Regrets about missed sperm banking opportunities have been reported, yet few decision tools for male adolescents with cancer exist. This study aims to report the development, testing, and adaptation of the Family-centered Adolescent Sperm banking values clarification Tool (FAST) using an iterative, user-centered design with male adolescents with cancer and their caregivers and to obtain feedback from clinicians and community partners.
methodsMales (12-25 years, diagnosed with cancer in the past year, received a routine fertility consult where sperm banking was offered) and caregivers completed the FAST on a screen-recorded device, a semi-structured interview, the System Usability Scale (SUS), and a sociodemographic questionnaire. Feedback informed FAST adaptations and was documented using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Expanded. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis characterized FAST completion information.
resultsTen families (16 caregivers, 9 adolescents) enrolled. Themes included: ease of navigation, perceived usefulness of the FAST, and perspectives on tool adaptations. Forty-three FAST adaptations were made in response to participant feedback. Median FAST completion time was 5 minutes and 37 seconds. The mean FAST SUS score was high at 84.60 (minimum = 57.50, maximum = 100, standard deviation = 11.08).
conclusionsApplying an iterative, user-centered approach, the FAST was developed, usability-tested, and adapted to a web-based format that families found easy to navigate and useful. Web-based tools, such as the FAST, could improve the sperm banking decision-making process for adolescent males and their caregivers by addressing unmet needs and ultimately improving satisfaction with fertility counseling outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.