ArticleJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2026
Peripheral Neural Plasticity in Cochlear Implant Users Across the Lifespan.
Article in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural Hearing Loss: Mechanisms, Diagnosis and Treatment Horizons.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026Review
- Establishing reliable neural health measures in adult cochlear implant users.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- The Failure Index as Marker of the Neural Health Profile in MED-EL CI Users: A Retrospective Analysis.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Neural recordings from cochlear implant users provide a valuable, noninvasive measure of auditory nerve function. However, inconsistent methods for acquiring and analyzing these recordings limit their clinical application. Objective: To develop and validate an automated method for standardizing the analysis of electrically evoked compound action potentials in cochlear implant users, and to characterize longitudinal changes in auditory nerve function across the largest cohort studied to date. Design, Settings, and Participants: This multicenter cohort study used nonlinear curve-fitting models to analyze electrically evoked compound action potentials acquired during clinical programming and follow-up at multiple US centers from July 28, 2002, to August 13, 2017. Data were analyzed from October 8, 2024 to May 6, 2025. Main Outcomes and Measures: Model fit success rates; variation in auditory nerve response parameters with age, sex, electrode location, and duration of implant use; and identification of age-related periods of peripheral neural plasticity. Results: The analysis included 1 145 323 electrically evoked compound action potential recordings comprising 169 159 growth functions from 10 111 cochlear implants in 7416 patients (3560 [48%] female and 3856 [52%] male individuals). Both models successfully fit approximately 80% of auditory-nerve growth functions. Thresholds increased from apex to base along the cochlear array, paralleled by a decline in response slope and plateau. Latencies remained stable across electrode locations. Age at implantation significantly predicted nerve response slope, with younger recipients showing steeper slopes that declined with increasing age, particularly after adolescence. In infants and toddlers, slopes continued to increase over 5 years of implant use, suggesting peripheral neural plasticity early in life. Older recipients showed minimal slope change over time. Although thresholds rose modestly with prolonged device use, slope and plateau stabilized after age 30 years, indicating that age at implantation, rather than stimulation duration, was the primary determinant of auditory nerve responsiveness. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study introduces a robust and scalable framework for in vivo assessment of auditory nerve function and monitoring of peripheral plasticity across the lifespan. The findings highlight the critical importance of early cochlear implantation for preserving neural health and optimizing long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.