Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41264268›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Health Care Staff-Reported Workplace Violence in Patient Safety Event Reports.

Azade Tabaie, Sonita S Bennett, Alberta K Tran, Raj M Ratwani, Mark Marino, Josanne Revoir, Kate M Kellogg, Laura Lee, Allan Fong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Azade TabaieCenter for Biostatistics, Informatics, and Data Science, MedStar Health Research Institute, MedStar Health, Columbia, Maryland.
Sonita S BennettCenter for Biostatistics, Informatics, and Data Science, MedStar Health Research Institute, MedStar Health, Columbia, Maryland.
Alberta K TranMedStar Institute for Quality and Safety, MedStar Health, Columbia, Maryland.
Raj M RatwaniDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Mark MarinoWorkplace Violence Prevention Programs, MedStar Health, Washington, DC.
Josanne RevoirMedStar Institute for Quality and Safety, MedStar Health, Columbia, Maryland.
Kate M KelloggMedStar Institute for Quality and Safety, MedStar Health, Columbia, Maryland.
Laura LeeMedStar Institute for Quality and Safety, MedStar Health, Columbia, Maryland.
Allan FongCenter for Biostatistics, Informatics, and Data Science, MedStar Health Research Institute, MedStar Health, Columbia, Maryland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Workplace violence (WPV) against health care staff is an important problem in the US and worldwide. Objective: To develop a WPV classification approach and investigate the characteristics of the WPV incidents committed against health care staff documented in patient safety event (PSE) reports. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study analyzed 975 self-reported PSEs recorded by health care staff from March 1 to September 20, 2023, from a multihospital health care system in the mid-Atlantic region of the US. Main Outcomes and Measures: A subset of PSE reports that potentially pertained to WPV incidents were identified through structured information of the reports. When available, the following information was captured from each report: type of WPV incident and harm, reported perpetrators and those exposed to WPV, precipitating factors to the WPV incident, reporter's job function, whether security officers or law enforcement were contacted, and facility type. Results: A total of 15 426 PSEs were recorded. Of those, 975 reports (6.3%) were selected; for 300 (30.8%) of these reports, the free-text description of incidents was reviewed by 2 independent investigators, interrater reliability (IRR) was calculated, and the WPV classification was developed. Two investigators then independently classified the remaining 675 reports. A median IRR of 84% (IQR, 68%-99%) was achieved. Eight hundred thirty-one reports (85.2%) were related to WPV and 144 (14.8%) did not contain WPV narratives. The 831 WPV reports were further analyzed, and additional information about the WPV incidents were identified: patient- or visitor-on-staff violence (673 [76.7%]), verbal harm (331 [39.8%]), patients as perpetrators (581 [69.9%]), nurses exposed to WPV (277 [33.3%]), agitation (193 [23.2%]) and aggression (179 [21.5%]) as the leading precipitating factors, nurses reporting incidents (533 [64.1%]), contact of security officers (391 [47.1%]) and law enforcement (70 [8.4%]), and incidents occurring in hospitals (767 [92.3%]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of 15 426 PSE reports, 831 WPV incidents were identified, most involving patient- or visitor-on-staff verbal harm, with nurses frequently exposed. Agitation and aggression were the leading precipitating factors. The insights from PSE reports can inform the development of targeted WPV intervention and prevention plans, ultimately enhancing the safety of frontline staff.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelPatient SafetyWorkplace ViolenceAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf Report

Identifiers

PMID41264268
PMCPMC12635879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.