Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41264240›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Static morphogen scaling enables proportional growth in a tissue growth model inspired by axolotl limb regeneration.

Natalia Lyubaykina, Dunja Knapp, Pietro Tardivo, Maximilian Kotz, Tatiana Sandoval-Guzmán, Benjamin M Friedrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Natalia LyubaykinaCluster of Excellence 'Physics of Life', Dresden University of Technology, Dresden 01307, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-7904-3107
Dunja KnappDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden 01307, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7533-2208
Pietro TardivoInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna BioCenter, Vienna 1030 Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7878-5272
Maximilian KotzCluster of Excellence 'Physics of Life', Dresden University of Technology, Dresden 01307, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-2722-2385
Tatiana Sandoval-GuzmánDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden 01307, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1802-5145
Benjamin M FriedrichCluster of Excellence 'Physics of Life', Dresden University of Technology, Dresden 01307, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9742-6555

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) 421143374Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) 441649267Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) EXC-2068-390729961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Axolotls can regenerate lost limbs throughout life, while they continue to grow. This poses the question of how the size and pattern of a regenerating limb is matched to a widely varying animal size. Two interacting signaling molecules, Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) and Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF8), are produced at opposite sides of the regenerating limb and sustain tissue growth through a pair of oppositely oriented signaling gradients. As the size of the regrowing tissue can vary more than three-fold depending on the size of the animal, it is unclear how the activities of these mutually dependent morphogens are maintained and subsequently terminated to determine appropriate growth. Scaling of limb regeneration suggests a size-dependent adaptation of morphogen gradient parameters. Inspired by this biological example, we theoretically investigate general mechanisms of morphogen-controlled growth arrest and proportional growth. In the proposed mechanism, tissue growth increases the spatial distance between the two morphogen gradients, which eventually arrests morphogen activity and growth. We put forward two distinct scaling scenarios of morphogen gradients: either dynamic scaling with blastema size, where morphogen gradient parameters change dynamically with the growing tissue, or static scaling with animal size, where morphogen gradient parameters stay constant during blastema growth and only depend on animal size. We show that static scaling ensures proportional growth, but dynamic scaling does not. We compare theory predictions to experimental quantification of SHH and FGF8 morphogen gradient parameters at different time-points of regeneration in different-sized animals, indicating static scaling for some morphogen parameters, which is sufficient to ensure proportional growth in our model.

Indexed as

Ambystoma mexicanumExtremitiesModels, BiologicalRegenerationAnimalsFibroblast Growth Factor 8Hedgehog ProteinsSignal TransductionFibroblast Growth Factor 8Hedgehog Proteinsadaptive morphogenesisaxolotlgrowth controlmorphogen gradient scalingregeneration

Identifiers

PMID41264240
PMCPMC12664003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.