Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41264238›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Object continuity through invisible retinal motion at saccadic speed.

Melis Ince, Carolin Hübner, Martin Rolfs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Melis InceDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin 10099, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9333-5269
Carolin HübnerDepartment of Psychology, Technische Universität Chemnitz, Chemnitz 09107, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0784-3679
Martin RolfsDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin 10099, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8214-8556

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) RO3579/10-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) RO3579/8-1EC | European Research Council (ERC) 865715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saccadic eye movements rapidly shift the visual scene across the retina, raising the question of how object correspondence is established between gaze fixations. Using submillisecond video projection, we isolated the role of high-speed retinal motion from saccade-related extraretinal signals. We introduced high-speed motion in a quartet motion display, a classic tool for studying long-distance object correspondence. While motion visibility dropped to chance level at saccadic speeds, even invisible motion robustly biased object correspondence. These results demonstrate that retinal motion alone can support object continuity across saccadic image shifts.

Indexed as

Motion PerceptionRetinaSaccadesAdultFemaleFixation, OcularHumansMaleMotionPhotic Stimulationactive visioneye movementsobject correspondenceperceptionvisual cognition

Identifiers

PMID41264238
PMCPMC12664004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.