Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41264222›Full record

SynthesisInternal and emergency medicine2026

Optimizing efficiency in the acute care chain: a systematic review on the implementation and impact of interdisciplinary short-term monitoring in acute care units.

Tobias R Neijzen, Mark E Haaksma, Niels Raaijmakers, Suzanne Schol-Gelok, Hilde M Wesselius, Marco Goeijenbier, Karin A H Kaasjager, Marjolein N T Kremers

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tobias R NeijzenDepartment of Intensive Care, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands.
Mark E HaaksmaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands.
Niels RaaijmakersDepartment of Internal Medicine and Emergency Department, St. Jans Gasthuis, Weert, The Netherlands.
Suzanne Schol-GelokEmergency Department, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Hilde M WesseliusDepartment of Internal Medicine, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle Aan Den IJssel, The Netherlands.
Marco GoeijenbierDepartment of Intensive Care, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands.
Karin A H KaasjagerDepartment of Infection and Immunity, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marjolein N T KremersEmergency Department, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.kremers@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-3791-8961

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing number of patients with multimorbidity and increasing disease complexity presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) poses a global challenge, with overcrowding as a major consequence. To address these pressures, various interdisciplinary short-term monitoring and treatment units, such as Acute Medical Units, Frailty Units, Observation Units, and Chest Pain Units, have been implemented to improve patient flow from presentation to discharge. This systematic review, conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, aimed to evaluate the reported effects of these units on patient outcomes and ED crowding. We searched multiple databases and included studies reporting at least one primary outcome measure (length of stay, mortality, costs, readmissions, or staff satisfaction) following implementation of such a unit. The search yielded 2972 results, of which 50 studies met the inclusion criteria. Reported outcomes included reductions in hospital length of stay (0.24 to 6.16 days), cost savings (ranging from €162 to nearly €2 million across eight studies), and stable or decreased mortality in some settings. However, the evidence base is heterogeneous, with units differing substantially in patient populations, aims, and models of care, and cost analyses often relying on limited methods. Consequently, strong general conclusions across all unit types are not possible. Nonetheless, these findings suggest that when well-matched to local system bottlenecks and patient populations, specialized acute care units can improve patient flow and contribute to the accessibility of emergency care without compromising quality.Trial Registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/A9EF7.

Indexed as

Efficiency, OrganizationalEmergency Service, HospitalHumansLength of StayMonitoring, PhysiologicAcute care for the elderly (ACE)Acute care unit (ACU)Acute medical unit (AMU)Acute medical unitsOrganisation of acute careShort stay unit (SSU)

Identifiers

PMID41264222
PMCPMC12948887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.