SynthesisInternal and emergency medicine2026
Optimizing efficiency in the acute care chain: a systematic review on the implementation and impact of interdisciplinary short-term monitoring in acute care units.
Synthesis in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimizing efficiency in the acute care chain: a systematic review on the implementation and impact of interdisciplinary short-term monitoring in acute care units: comment.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing number of patients with multimorbidity and increasing disease complexity presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) poses a global challenge, with overcrowding as a major consequence. To address these pressures, various interdisciplinary short-term monitoring and treatment units, such as Acute Medical Units, Frailty Units, Observation Units, and Chest Pain Units, have been implemented to improve patient flow from presentation to discharge. This systematic review, conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, aimed to evaluate the reported effects of these units on patient outcomes and ED crowding. We searched multiple databases and included studies reporting at least one primary outcome measure (length of stay, mortality, costs, readmissions, or staff satisfaction) following implementation of such a unit. The search yielded 2972 results, of which 50 studies met the inclusion criteria. Reported outcomes included reductions in hospital length of stay (0.24 to 6.16 days), cost savings (ranging from €162 to nearly €2 million across eight studies), and stable or decreased mortality in some settings. However, the evidence base is heterogeneous, with units differing substantially in patient populations, aims, and models of care, and cost analyses often relying on limited methods. Consequently, strong general conclusions across all unit types are not possible. Nonetheless, these findings suggest that when well-matched to local system bottlenecks and patient populations, specialized acute care units can improve patient flow and contribute to the accessibility of emergency care without compromising quality.Trial Registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/A9EF7.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.