ArticleSpine deformity2026
Pelvic incidence correlates more strongly with proximal than distal lordosis and most strongly with L1-pelvic angle.
Article in Spine deformity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Vertebral Body Wedge Geometry Predicts Lumbar Lordosis Beyond Pelvic Morphology in Chronic Low Back Pain.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePelvic incidence (PI) is a critical morphologic parameter influencing sagittal spinal alignment. While the PI-lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch is well studied, the extent to which PI correlates with proximal versus distal LL remains unclear. Additionally, the L1-pelvic angle (L1PA) is emerging as a potential metric for sagittal alignment assessment. This study aimed to evaluate the associations between PI, segmental LL, and L1PA to establish goal sagittal alignment benchmarks in a symptomatic non-deformity cohort.
methodsA retrospective analysis (STUDY-17-00660) was conducted on a large consecutive series of adults undergoing full-body biplanar radiographs. Patients with spinal deformity or prior spinal surgery were excluded. Measurements included PI, proximal LL (L1-L4), distal LL (L4-S1), global LL (L1-S1), and L1PA. Multivariable linear regression models were adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). Correlation coefficients and Fisher's z tests were used to compare the strength of associations between PI and each alignment measure.
resultsA total of 507 patients (mean age 48.4 ± 17.2 years; 50.9% female) were included. Multivariate regression demonstrates a 10° increase in PI was associated with increases of 3.7° in proximal LL, 1.9° in distal LL, 5.6° in global LL, and 5.0° in L1PA (all p < 0.001). PI showed a stronger correlation with proximal LL (r = 0.50) than distal LL (r = 0.23) and the strongest correlation with L1PA (r = 0.79).
conclusionPI correlates more strongly with proximal than distal lumbar lordosis and most strongly with L1PA. These findings support greater emphasis on proximal lordosis and the utility of L1PA in the restoration of sagittal alignment in adult spinal deformity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41264220What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.