ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Evaluating the Performance of ChatGPT-4V in Detecting Inflammatory Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings of Sacroiliitis: Potentials, Challenges, and Limitations.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ChatGPT-4V, an AI model with visual capabilities, in detecting sacroiliitis on MRI and compares its performance to expert radiologists. This retrospective study included 125 patients (250 sacroiliac joint images) from a tertiary hospital's Picture Archiving and Communication System. MRI scans, including coronal T1-weighted and semicoronal STIR sequences, were assessed by two experienced radiologists. ChatGPT-4V was prompted with standardized queries to analyze the images for signs of active or chronic sacroiliitis. Its diagnostic outputs were compared to the radiologists' assessments. Performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, precision, and area under the curve (AUC), were calculated. ChatGPT-4V demonstrated high sensitivity for detecting bone marrow edema (0.955; AUC, 0.84) but lower sensitivity for sclerosis (0.211; AUC, 0.55), joint space narrowing (0.298; AUC, 0.59), and joint surface irregularities (0.433; AUC, 0.59). The overall accuracy of the model was 0.624, with a weighted-average AUC of 0.62. ChatGPT-4V excelled in identifying active inflammatory changes but underperformed in detecting chronic structural abnormalities. ChatGPT-4V shows promise in detecting active inflammatory sacroiliitis, particularly bone marrow edema, but its current inability to reliably identify chronic structural abnormalities limits its standalone clinical utility. To achieve enhanced diagnostic capability and enable clinical integration, future efforts must focus on model fine-tuning using specialist-labeled radiological datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.