Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41264162›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2026

Clinical and molecular determinants of response to maintenance olaparib for primary and recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Matthew K Wagar, Kharmen Bharucha, Lauren Montemorano, Laura B Huffman, Amy L Godecker, Lisa M Barroilhet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthew K WagarDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792, USA. matthew.wagar@uvahealth.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2300-404X
Kharmen BharuchaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.
Lauren MontemoranoDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.
Laura B HuffmanDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.
Amy L GodeckerDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.
Lisa M BarroilhetDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo characterize long-term (LT) and short-term (ST) responders to the Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib in the primary and recurrent maintenance setting.

methodsClinical and molecular data was collected for patients receiving maintenance olaparib between January 2014 and July 2021. ST responders were defined as those experiencing progression < 6 months from initiating olaparib, whereas LT responders exhibited response ≥ 2 years. Molecular analysis included germline BRCA1/2 status, Myriad MyChoice CDx Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) somatic testing, and STRATA Select comprehensive genomic profiling.

results124 patients who received olaparib were included; 45 (36.3%) LT and 31 (25.0%) ST responders were identified. BRCA2 mutations were enriched among the LT responders compared to ST responders (16 (35.5%) v. 4 (12.9%), p = 0.028) and LT responders were more likely to be HRD (40 (88.9%) v 19 (61.3%), p = 0.005). Patients receiving olaparib following platinum-sensitive recurrence were more likely to experience ST response compared to the primary setting (24 (55.8%) vs 7 (21.2%), p = 0.002). In both the primary and recurrent setting, LT responders were more likely to have a complete response to the most recent chemotherapy when compared to those experiencing ST response (24 (92.3%) v. 3 (42.9%), for primary maintenance, p = 0.021 and 10 (52.6%) v. 3 (12.5%) for recurrent, p = 0.004).

conclusionsLT response to olaparib for primary maintenance is common, and more frequently observed in patients with a complete response to platinum-based chemotherapy. BRCA2 mutations conferred exceptional benefit to olaparib. Durable benefit was more commonly observed in patient's receiving frontline maintenance olaparib.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOvarian NeoplasmsPhthalazinesPiperazinesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsAdultAgedBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinFemaleGerm-Line MutationHumansMaintenance ChemotherapyMiddle AgedBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanolaparibPhthalazinesPiperazinesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsBRCAHomologous recombinationOvarian cancerPARP inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID41264162
PMCPMC13099822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.