ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Importance of a Systematic Intervertebral Motion Parametrization for in vivo Assessment of Spine Biomechanics.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSurgical decision-making for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) relies on geometrical rather than biomechanical properties, such as the spine's in vivo load characteristics. While both in vivo and in vitro spinal loading experiments can provide valuable insights, a standardized method to compare motion for the Functional Spinal Unit (FSU) is lacking. This work aims to establish a systematic motion parametrization to unambiguously characterize FSU pose changes suitable for a robotic in vivo spinal loading application.
methodIn this work, we propose an FSU motion parameterization using robotic rigid-body-tree modelling, deploying a virtual six-degree-of-freedom joint in the intervertebral space. To demonstrate the importance of the parameterization, we analysed the effect of different joint definitions on the produced displacement considering i) preoperative or intraoperative FSU reference poses, obtained from CT imaging of an AIS patient, and ii) one or both vertebral coordinate systems of the FSU. Additionally, we compared the required wrench capabilities of an actuation device to achieve pure spinal loading conditions in a pedicle screw-mounted scenario.
resultsApplying identical virtual motions resulted in differences of up to 0.38 mm in translation and
conclusionOur findings underline the importance of a robust FSU kinematic framework, critical for ensuring safe and reliable FSU manipulation and for obtaining comparable and reproducible in vivo biomechanical data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.