Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41264142›Full record

ArticleBiodegradation2025

Isolation and identification of soil bacteria capable of degrading biodegradable mulch films.

Harshal J Kansara, Yvan D Hernandez-Charpak, André O Hudson, Thomas A Trabold, Jeffrey S Lodge, Carlos A Diaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biodegradation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Harshal J KansaraRochester Institute of Technology, Golisano Institute for Sustainability, Rochester, NY, USA.
Yvan D Hernandez-CharpakRochester Institute of Technology, Golisano Institute for Sustainability, Rochester, NY, USA.
André O HudsonThomas H. Gosnell School of Life Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA.
Thomas A TraboldRochester Institute of Technology, Golisano Institute for Sustainability, Rochester, NY, USA.
Jeffrey S LodgeThomas H. Gosnell School of Life Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA.
Carlos A DiazDepartment of Packaging and Graphic Media Science, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA. cdamet@rit.edu.

Funding

Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research #CA19-SS-0000000013New York Empire State Development #C190155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agricultural mulch films (AMFs) enhance crop productivity by controlling soil temperature and moisture and suppressing weed growth. Conventional AMFs made from polyethylene (PE) pose disposal challenges and contribute to long-term plastic pollution. Biodegradable mulch films (BMFs) offer a promising alternative, but their degradation in soil remains slow and inconsistent. This study employed a culture-enrichment approach to isolate soil bacteria (i.e., Pseudomonas guariconensis and Achromobacter denitrificans) capable of accelerating BMF biodegradation. Bioaugmentation with P. guariconensis enhanced CO₂ evolution in soil, with 48% and 36% carbon mineralization for two commercial BMFs (i.e., Bio360 and EcoVio), compared to 17% and 6.2% in non-inoculated soils. These findings demonstrate that targeted bacterial enrichment can accelerate BMF degradation, highlighting the potential for bioaugmentation to mitigate plastic accumulation in agricultural soils.

Indexed as

Achromobacter denitrificansBacteriaPseudomonasSoil MicrobiologySoil PollutantsBiodegradation, EnvironmentalPolyethyleneSoilPolyethyleneSoilSoil PollutantsBacterial growthBiodegradable mulch films (BMFs)BiodegradationCarbon mineralizationCulture enrichment

Identifiers

PMID41264142
PMCPMC12634803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.