ArticleBiologia futura2026
Spatial analysis and niche overlap of two lapwing (Genus: Vanellus) species in the confluence of two biodiversity hotspots in South Asia.
Article in Biologia futura, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Environmental factors play a critical role in shaping species distribution and resource utilization patterns. However, a gap of knowledge exists in understanding the niche dynamics between the two species; the ‘Least Concern’- Vanellus indicus (Red-wattled Lapwing) and the ‘Near Threatened’-Vanellus duvaucelii (River Lapwing), a difference that could prove critical for long-term conservation efforts. Thus, the present study aims to understand whether environmental variables influence their spatial patterns and examine the potential impact of niche overlap. Using primary and secondary species occurrence data, combined with environmental datasets, we modelled suitable habitats using an ensemble approach for each species with the SSDM package in R. Ensemble models performed well, yielding good predictive performance for both Vanellus indicus (AUC = 0.89) and Vanellus duvaucelii (AUC = 0.88). Predicted habitat areas for V. indicus were 28,818.35 km2 (high suitability), 23,101.29 km2 (moderate suitability), and 29,815.65 km2 (low suitability). For V. duvaucelii, these values were 12,429.95 km2, 26,452.24 km2, and 53,775.59 km2, respectively. Niche overlap, measured with Schoener’s D, was 0.55, indicating moderate similarity, with 0.07 and 0.04 representing unique niches for V. duvaucelii and V. indicus, respectively, and 0.96 of the being niches shared. These results underscore the ecological implications of niche sharing between overlapping species and highlight potential risks for V. duvaucelii, as overlapping habitats and limited niche exclusivity could increase vulnerability under rapidly changing environmental conditions. These findings further highlight the ecological consequences of niche sharing between the species and point out possible risks for V. duvaucelii, and thus poor niche separation may increase vulnerability under rapid environmental change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41264115What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.