Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41264104›Full record

ArticleScience and engineering ethics2025

Promoting User Involvement to Foster Technological Citizenship in the Digitizing Healthcare Domain.

Anne Marte Gardenier, Iris Cramer, Rinie van Est

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science and engineering ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anne Marte GardenierDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences, Technology Innovation and Society, Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 3, Eindhoven, 5612 AE, The Netherlands. a.m.gardenier@tue.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-8413-9167
Iris CramerDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 3, Eindhoven, 5612 AE, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-9781-8475
Rinie van EstDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences, Technology Innovation and Society, Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 3, Eindhoven, 5612 AE, The Netherlands.

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 410.19.004Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek IMDI104021003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is playing an increasingly prominent role in healthcare technology, particularly in patient monitoring and diagnosis. While AI offers significant benefits, it raises concerns about the patient-provider relationship and key care values. To mitigate these risks and align technology with societal values, experts stress the importance of user involvement in technology development. However, input from patients or nurses during AI development remains uncommon. The rapidly digitizing healthcare thus demonstrates a context where technological citizenship is not yet thriving, underscoring the need for improvement in this area. This article examines a case study where nurses contributed to the development of an AI-driven monitoring camera for the cardiothoracic surgery department. Based on interview data, our study shows that involving users, particularly nurses, can lead to the improved innovation of a socio-technical care practice, greater recognition of the importance of user involvement among technology developers, and increased empowerment of nurses with regards to the technology that impacts their work practice. To promote technological citizenship in the evolving healthcare landscape, this article offers recommendations for fostering greater user involvement during the development and implementation of new technologies.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCommunity ParticipationDelivery of Health CareNursesPatient ParticipationDigital HealthHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicPower, PsychologicalArtificial intelligenceContinuous monitoring cameraDigitizationHealth care technologySocio-technical systemTechnological citizenshipUser involvement

Identifiers

PMID41264104
PMCPMC12634806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.