ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026
Changing the Presentation of Overnight Admissions to Improve Teaching Rounds.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIncreased use of night float systems for overnight admissions in internal medicine has led to trainees presenting newly admitted patients that they did not personally admit in many US residency programs.
aimTo examine the impact of an alternative presentation model for patients admitted overnight by another resident, with the theory that this might improve efficiency and educational experience.
settingThe pilot was done on the general medicine teams of an academic medical center.
participantsFour teams participated, comprised of 12 residents and 4 attendings in total. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: For this pilot, the attending and supervising resident were asked to review overnight admissions before the rounds, use a streamlined patient presentation, and encourage critical review of the initial clinical reasoning. Teams used the traditional presentation for 1 week and then the new model for the subsequent 2 weeks of a 3-week rotation. PROGRAM EVALUATION: Fifteen of 16 participants returned the surveys, and they generally rated the new approach superior to the traditional approach. Time studies found it time neutral. DISCUSSION: Both faculty and trainees broadly preferred the new approach for presenting overnight admissions. This approach required no extra funding, was simple to implement, and did not increase rounding time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.