ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2026
Tiopronin safety in cystinuria: first real-world pharmacovigilance analysis using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS): an EAU YAU and Endourology sections review.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cystinuria: Diagnosis, Medical and Surgical Management, and Emerging Therapies. A Narrative Review.Research and reports in urology · 2026Review
- Inborn Errors of Amino Acid Metabolism Revisited: Clinical Implications and Insights into Current Therapies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCystinuria is a rare genetic disorder that causes recurrent cystine stones and significant morbidity, particularly in children. Tiopronin, the main pharmacologic therapy when conservative measures fail, reduces cystine precipitation and excretion; however, real-world safety data remain scarce.
methodsWe evaluated tiopronin's adverse-event profile using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) by reviewing reports from Q1 2014 to Q1 2025. After deduplication per FDA guidance, only cases in which tiopronin was recorded as the primary suspect drug were included. Adverse events were coded using MedDRA version 28.0 at the Preferred Term and System Organ Class levels, and disproportionality analysis was performed with Reporting Odds Ratio, Proportional Reporting Ratio, Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network, and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker algorithms.
resultsA total of 1,838 unique cases were identified, with 69.6% involving pediatric patients. Most reports originated from the United States (99.4%) and were submitted by physicians (86.5%). Significant safety signals emerged in seven System Organ Classes and 67 Preferred Terms. In addition to expected cystinuria-related events, we detected unlabelled signals such as hyposmia, skin atrophy, breath odour, tongue discoloration, and incorrect dosage administered, the latter being particularly relevant in children.
conclusionThis first FAERS-based pharmacovigilance study of tiopronin identified both known and novel safety signals, underscoring challenges in pediatric dosing and the need for enhanced pharmacovigilance, accurate treatment oversight, and improved education for families and clinicians. Limitations include underreporting, incomplete data, and potential confounding by indication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41263948What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.