ArticleBMJ open2025
Designing a national framework for preventing fraud in Iran's health system: a sequential mixed-methods study using qualitative analysis and Delphi consensus.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo design and validate a comprehensive, expert-informed national framework to prevent and control fraud and misconduct in Iran's health system. Fraud in this context refers to practices such as false claims, overbilling, unnecessary prescriptions, informal payments and beneficiary manipulation, which undermine efficiency and trust.
designA sequential mixed-methods study, including an exploratory qualitative phase followed by a two-round Delphi consensus process.
settingNational-level study across multiple sectors of Iran's health system, including insurance, governance and health policy institutions.
participantsIn the qualitative phase, 12 experts (senior managers, auditors and policymakers) were interviewed, achieving data saturation. In the Delphi phase, 31 experts participated in Round 1 and 27 completed Round 2. All had ≥5 years of relevant experience in health management, fraud detection or policy-making.
resultsFramework analysis of interviews identified six strategic categories: cultural, educational, legal, technological, insurance-related and structural interventions. These were validated and prioritised through the Delphi process. High consensus (≥75%) was achieved for most items, with unanimous agreement on legal clarity, enforceable sanctions and electronic identity verification. The final framework comprised three overarching domains-capacity building, strengthening oversight systems and modernisation of operational infrastructure-operationalised through six strategic pillars.
conclusionsThis study proposes a validated and context-specific anti-fraud framework tailored to Iran's health system. By combining qualitative exploration with structured consensus, the framework offers practical strategies for enhancing transparency, accountability and resilience. It may also serve as a model for other low- and middle-income countries facing similar governance challenges.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.