Trial reportBMJ open2025
Intravenous immunoglobulin and prednisolone to women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss after assisted reproductive technology treatment: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Trial report in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04701034 (Intravenous Immunoglobulin and Prednisolone to Women With Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss After Assisted Reproductive Technology Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Intravenous Immunoglobulin and Prednisolone to Women With Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss After Assisted Reproductive Technology Treatment: a Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regulatory T cells in pregnancy disorders: a multi-dimensional framework for biomarkers and therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Bimodal ultrasound assessment of cerebral hemodynamics in preterm infants stratified by maternal immunotherapy: implications for early prediction of intraventricular hemorrhage.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Early intravenous immunoglobulin use improves live birth outcomes in women with recurrent pregnancy loss: a propensity score-matched cohort study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate whether treatment with oral corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) improves pregnancy outcomes in women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) following assisted reproduction technology (ART) treatment.
designA randomised, double-blinded, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial conducted from January 2021 to February 2024.
settingA single-centre trial at a Danish tertiary clinic for RPL management.
participants80 women with at least two consecutive early pregnancy losses following ART, age 18-41 years, body mass index below 35, and no identified cause of RPL. Forty participants were allocated to each group, with 37 fulfilling the protocol criteria in each group.
interventionsParticipants were randomised to receive either a combination of low-dose oral prednisolone starting on the first day of menstruation and IVIg given the first time around the time of embryo transfer; or matching placebo tablets and albumin infusions. Treatment continued until gestational week 8+4 in those who conceived with a total of four infusions. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were the ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) defined as a living fetus in gestational week 13 among all randomised participants and in those who conceived after embryo transfer, respectively, based on intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. Secondary outcomes included safety outcomes related to pregnancy complications and neonatal health.
resultsOPR was equal to live birth rate. Among all randomised participants (ITT), the OPR was 25.0% in the treatment group and 15.0% in the placebo group (relative risk 1.67; 95% CI 0.67 to 4.15; p=0.26). Among participants without major protocol deviations (PP), OPRs were 21.6% and 16.2%, respectively (relative risk 1.33; 95% CI 0.51 to 3.47; p=0.55). Among participants who became pregnant following embryo transfer, ongoing pregnancy occurred in 83.3% of the treatment group and 42.9% of the placebo group (relative risk 1.94; 95% CI 1.01 to 3.75; p=0.05). No differences in adverse events or neonatal outcomes were observed between the two groups.
conclusionsThe combination of oral corticosteroids and IVIg did not improve overall pregnancy rates in women with RPL after ART. However, among those who achieved pregnancy after embryo transfer, the risk of pregnancy loss appeared reduced. Larger randomised trials are needed to confirm these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.Gov: NCT04701034. Registration date: 5 January 2021EudraCT number: 2020-000256-35; Registration date: 11 November 2020The North Denmark Region Committee on Health Research Ethics: N-20200066, Registration date: 16 December 2020The Data Protection Agency: 2020-156; Registration date: 4 November 2020WHO universal trial number: U1111-1273-8585Date of first patient's enrolment: 28 January 2021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.