Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41263858›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Does luteal phase support in MOH-IUI treatment improve cumulative live birth rates in couples with unexplained subfertility? Study protocol of the LUMO study: a centre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis.

Emma Preesman, Katja Drechsel, Heleen Crommelin, Frank Broekmans, Willem Verpoest, Simone Broer, LUMO Study Group

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05080569 (LUMO Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05080569 phase4recruitingnot on this map

LUMO Study: Luteal Phase Support in IUI MOH Treatment Luteal Phase Support in IUI MOH

TypeinterventionalSponsorUMC UtrechtRan2023 to 2027Enrolled1,008ConditionsPregnancy Related, Fertility Issues, Luteal Phase Defect, Infertility UnexplainedArmsProgesterone Vaginal Product, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emma PreesmanDivision Woman and Baby, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands e.e.preesman-2@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0248-0688
Katja DrechselDivision Woman and Baby, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Heleen CrommelinLaboratories, Pharmacy, and Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Frank BroekmansDivision Woman and Baby, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Willem VerpoestDivision Woman and Baby, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Simone BroerDivision Woman and Baby, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
LUMO Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCouples diagnosed with unexplained subfertility are advised to start mild ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination (MOH-IUI) as a primary treatment. Natural feedback mechanisms and hormone release are affected by artificially stimulated cycles and induced ovulation. Additional luteal support could positively affect progesterone patterns in the luteal phase. The LUMO study evaluates whether the addition of exogenous progesterone in the luteal phase following MOH-IUI treatment cycle will improve pregnancy and live birth rates. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A multicentre randomised, double-blind, controlled trial will be conducted in Dutch fertility clinics, academic and non-academic hospitals. There are two treatment arms: group A progesterone luteal phase support; group B placebo, without crossover. All initiated MOH-IUI cycles within 6 months after randomisation are included (study period). Participants will start study medication, applying a daily dosage of 2dd 300 mg progesterone (Utrogestan) or 2dd 300 mg placebo in vaginal capsules on the second day after the IUI procedure. Treatment is continued until the onset of menstruation, a negative pregnancy test (IUI+14 days), a miscarriage or until 7 weeks of gestation in case of a viable pregnancy. Follow-up ends at 12 months after the end of study period (18 months after study randomisation). The primary outcome is cumulative pregnancy rate, achieved within 6 months after randomisation, leading to live birth. A total of 1008 patients (504 patients in each group) will be included. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects on 30 January 2023. All participating sites have the approval of the local Board of Directors to participate in the LUMO study. An informed consent form will be signed by all participants. Study results will be presented at (inter)national conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. It is expected that the results of this trial will be used to draft national guidelines on this issue. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study is registered in the EU CTIS trial register (2022-501534-33-00), the Dutch trial registry (registration number: LTR 24508), ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05080569) and the WHO registry (universal trial number: U1111-1280-9461).

Indexed as

InfertilityInsemination, ArtificialLuteal PhaseOvulation InductionProgesteroneAdultBirth RateCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLive BirthMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicNetherlandsProgesteroneRandomized Controlled TrialReproductive medicineSubfertility

Identifiers

PMID41263858
PMCPMC12636955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.