Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41263857›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Biceps lasso loop and self-locking tenodesis alongside repair of rotator cuff tears: randomised controlled trial study protocol (BLAST 1).

Igor J Shirinskiy, Dries Boulidam, Arno A Macken, Michel P J van den Bekerom, Thibault Lafosse, Geert Alexander Buijze

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06774820 (Biceps Lasso Loop and Self- Locking Tenodesis Alongside Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06774820 narecruitingnot on this map

Biceps Lasso Loop and Self- Locking Tenodesis Alongside Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears: Randomised Controlled Trial Study Protocol (BLAST 1)

TypeinterventionalSponsorClinique Générale dAnnecyRan2025 to 2028Enrolled100ConditionsRotator Cuff InjuryArmsself-blocking tenodesis, arthroscopic tenodesis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Igor J ShirinskiyHand, Upper Limb, Peripheral Nerve, Brachial Plexus and Microsurgery Unit, Clinique Générale d'Annecy, Annecy, France i.j.shirinskiy@olvg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-3192-887X
Dries BoulidamHand, Upper Limb, Peripheral Nerve, Brachial Plexus and Microsurgery Unit, Clinique Générale d'Annecy, Annecy, France.
Arno A MackenHand, Upper Limb, Peripheral Nerve, Brachial Plexus and Microsurgery Unit, Clinique Générale d'Annecy, Annecy, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7513-7437
Michel P J van den BekeromOLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5146-6148
Thibault LafosseHand, Upper Limb, Peripheral Nerve, Brachial Plexus and Microsurgery Unit, Clinique Générale d'Annecy, Annecy, France.
Geert Alexander BuijzeHand, Upper Limb, Peripheral Nerve, Brachial Plexus and Microsurgery Unit, Clinique Générale d'Annecy, Annecy, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPathology of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) frequently accompanies rotator cuff tears, with tenotomy and tenodesis often being used to address this pathology. While meta-analyses report comparable functional outcomes between these techniques, tenotomy is linked to higher rates of Popeye deformity, whereas tenodesis is more technically demanding and might involve extra material. A novel self-locking tenodesis technique aims to reduce deformity risk while being a simpler alternative to the conventional tenodesis procedure; however, comparative evidence is currently limited. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-centre, patient-blinded randomised controlled trial will enrol 100 patients aged ≥40 years with reparable, non-traumatic, full-thickness supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus and/or subscapularis tendon tears undergoing arthroscopic repair from January 2025 until January 2027. Key exclusion criteria include massive or irreparable tears, advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis and prior shoulder surgery. Participants will be randomised to either 360 double lasso loop tenodesis or self-locking tenodesis. The primary outcome is the Constant score at 1 year, with a predefined non-inferiority margin of 10 points. Secondary outcomes include American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, simple shoulder value score, LHB score, cosmetic appearance, pain scores and radiographic tendon migration. Statistical non-inferiority will be assessed using a one-sided t-test. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol received approval from the National Ethical Review Board in France (CPP Sud-Est V) and was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06774820.

Indexed as

Rotator Cuff InjuriesTenodesisAdultArthroscopyHumansMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRotator CuffTreatment OutcomeClinical TrialMusculoskeletal disordersOrthopedicsShoulder

Identifiers

PMID41263857
PMCPMC12636964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.