SynthesisJournal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care
Uptake of Appointment Spacing Model of Care and Determinants Among Adult Clients on Antiretroviral Treatment in Ethiopia.
Synthesis in Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Determinants of Appointment Spacing Model Acceptance Among People Living With HIV in Dessie City, Northeast Ethiopia: Case-Control Study.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS CareArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionTo sustain progress toward epidemic control, it remains essential to enhance and refine Appointment Spacing Model (ASM) implementation while reinforcing coordination between health facilities and community services. Nonetheless, even with the rollout of the six-month multi-month scripting (MMS)/ASM, there is still limited evidence on its nationwide adoption and the factors that affect its utilization.MethodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis followed a protocol registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with the reference number CRD42024597279. Articles were retrieved from multiple electronic databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Wiley Online Library, Cochrane Library, and African Journal Online, with additional gray literature searched via Google Scholar. Data were initially extracted in Microsoft Excel and subsequently imported into STATA version 11 for analysis. Study heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.