ArticleJournal of vision2025
Violated expectations during locomotion through virtual environments: Age effects on gaze guidance.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Task-irrelevant human and robot head movements bias gaze in humans who follow them through virtual reality.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gaze behavior during locomotion must balance the sampling of relevant information and the need for a stable gait. To maintain a safe gait in the light of declining resources, older adults might shift this balance toward the uptake of gait-related information. We investigated how violations of expectations affect gaze behavior and information uptake across age groups by asking younger and older adults to locomote through a virtual hallway, where they encountered expected and unexpected objects. We found that older adults look more on the floor, despite the translational locomotion, though not the rotational, being virtual. Dwell times on unexpected objects were increased in both age groups compared to expected objects. Although older adults showed shorter dwell times on expected objects, dwell times on unexpected objects were similar across age groups. Thus the difference between expected and unexpected objects was greater in older adults. Gaze distributions were more influenced by cognitive control capacities than by motor control capacities. Our findings indicate that unexpected information attracts attention during locomotion-particularly in older adults. However, during actual locomotion in the real world, increased information processing might come at the cost of reduced gait safety if processing resources are shifted away from stabilizing gait.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.