Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41263472›Full record

Observational studyActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2026

Predictive factors for emergency cervical cerclage efficacy in singleton and twin pregnancies: A retrospective cohort study.

Cecile C Hulshoff, Marc E A Spaanderman, Ralph R Scholten, Joris van Drongelen

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cecile C HulshoffDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4064-3855
Marc E A SpaandermanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ralph R ScholtenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Joris van DrongelenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAn emergency (rescue, exam-indicated) cervical cerclage can be offered to pregnant women presenting with cervical dilatation and prolapsed fetal membranes in the second trimester of pregnancy due to suspected cervical insufficiency. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of emergency cerclage in preventing extreme preterm birth in singleton and twin pregnancies, and to identify predictors of unsuccessful outcomes. We conducted a 15-year observational cohort study at a tertiary care center in the Netherlands, including all women who underwent emergency cerclage. Analyses were conducted for the total population and stratified by pregnancy type, with direct comparisons between singleton and twin pregnancies. Outcomes included gestational age at delivery, offspring survival, and pregnancy prolongation. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed pregnancy prolongation, with survival curves compared using the log-rank test. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of preterm birth <28 weeks, using backward stepwise selection. Results were reported as adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals, and model performance was evaluated using AUC.

resultsA total of 99 women were included: 64 singleton pregnancies and 35 twin pregnancies. We observed an overall survival of 77%, a median gestational age at delivery of 29.4 weeks, and pregnancy prolongation after cerclage placement of 53.0 days. For pregnancies that passed 24 weeks of gestation, overall survival was 92%. Outcomes were comparable between singleton and twin pregnancies. Key factors associated with reduced pregnancy prolongation were vaginal bleeding, prolapsed membranes beyond external os, cervical dilation ≥4.0 cm, elevated white blood cell count (≥13.600 mm

conclusionsEmergency cerclage is associated with high offspring survival in both singletons and twins. Clinical factors, among advanced cervical dilation and elevated infectious parameters prior to placement, significantly affect its efficacy, although prolapsed membranes and GA at cerclage placement emerged to be the most critical predictors for preterm birth <28 weeks. These findings provide valuable insights that can be used in the counseling of couples about the pros and cons of an emergency cerclage.

Indexed as

Cerclage, CervicalPregnancy, TwinPremature BirthUterine Cervical IncompetenceAdultFemaleGestational AgeHumansNetherlandsPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective Studiescerclagecervical insufficiencyemergencyphysical examination indicatedpremature birthrescuesingleton pregnancytwin pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID41263472
PMCPMC12746203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.