Observational studyActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2026
Predictive factors for emergency cervical cerclage efficacy in singleton and twin pregnancies: A retrospective cohort study.
Observational study in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cervical cerclage outcomes by indication and cervical length across gestational-age thresholds: a historical cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Methodological considerations regarding predictor selection and model overfitting in a study of emergency cerclage.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Predictive factors for emergency cervical cerclage efficacy in singleton and twin pregnancies: A retrospective cohort study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAn emergency (rescue, exam-indicated) cervical cerclage can be offered to pregnant women presenting with cervical dilatation and prolapsed fetal membranes in the second trimester of pregnancy due to suspected cervical insufficiency. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of emergency cerclage in preventing extreme preterm birth in singleton and twin pregnancies, and to identify predictors of unsuccessful outcomes. We conducted a 15-year observational cohort study at a tertiary care center in the Netherlands, including all women who underwent emergency cerclage. Analyses were conducted for the total population and stratified by pregnancy type, with direct comparisons between singleton and twin pregnancies. Outcomes included gestational age at delivery, offspring survival, and pregnancy prolongation. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed pregnancy prolongation, with survival curves compared using the log-rank test. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of preterm birth <28 weeks, using backward stepwise selection. Results were reported as adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals, and model performance was evaluated using AUC.
resultsA total of 99 women were included: 64 singleton pregnancies and 35 twin pregnancies. We observed an overall survival of 77%, a median gestational age at delivery of 29.4 weeks, and pregnancy prolongation after cerclage placement of 53.0 days. For pregnancies that passed 24 weeks of gestation, overall survival was 92%. Outcomes were comparable between singleton and twin pregnancies. Key factors associated with reduced pregnancy prolongation were vaginal bleeding, prolapsed membranes beyond external os, cervical dilation ≥4.0 cm, elevated white blood cell count (≥13.600 mm
conclusionsEmergency cerclage is associated with high offspring survival in both singletons and twins. Clinical factors, among advanced cervical dilation and elevated infectious parameters prior to placement, significantly affect its efficacy, although prolapsed membranes and GA at cerclage placement emerged to be the most critical predictors for preterm birth <28 weeks. These findings provide valuable insights that can be used in the counseling of couples about the pros and cons of an emergency cerclage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.