ArticleJournal of occupational health2025
Sweat Na+/K+ ratio as a practical biological index for estimating sweating rate and salt loss rate.
Article in Journal of occupational health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives A simple method to evaluate clinically the sweating rate and the salt loss rate via sweating would enable the early detection of heat-related illness in workers. We measured K+ concentration in sweat and calculated the Na+/K+ ratio to evaluate its utility for estimating sweating rate and salt loss rate. We hypothesized that compared with single electrolyte concentrations, the Na+/K+ ratio would be less affected by the rapid evaporation of sweat. Methods Thirteen healthy males exercised on a bicycle ergometer in an artificial climate room, and their sweating rates and Na+ and K+ concentrations in sweat were measured. We also compared sealed and open methods of sweat collection, which respectively prevent or permit evaporation of sweat from the collection area. Results When sweating rate increased, Na+ concentration increased, and K+ concentration decreased. Na+ concentration and the Na+/K+ ratio were significantly lower among habitual exercisers. Sweating rate was more strongly associated with the Na+/K+ ratio than with Na+ concentration. Similarly, the calculated NaCl loss rate was more strongly correlated with the Na+/K+ ratio than with Na+ concentration. The open sweat collection method reliably demonstrated individual variation in the Na+/K+ ratio. Conclusions The Na+/K+ ratio is more accurate than Na+ concentration for predicting sweating rate and the calculated NaCl loss rate because it accounts for individual sweat variation. The Na+/K+ ratio is not influenced by sweat evaporation, and samples can be practically obtained by briefly applying absorbent paper to the skin surface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.