Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41263288›Full record

ReviewACS nano2025

Endosomal Escape of Lipid Nanoparticles: A Perspective on the Literature Data.

Dehua Pei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS nano, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Nanomaterials-Based Immunotherapy for Atherosclerosis.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Target, silence, replace: a review on RNA-based drugs in modern medicine.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dehua PeiDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, 484 West 12th Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2057-6934

Funding

Development of Cell-Permeable Peptides and ProteinsR35GM122459 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Dehua Pei · 2017 to 2026
$5.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endosomal escape remains a critical bottleneck for the intracellular delivery of nucleic acids by lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), largely due to its low efficiency and poorly understood mechanism. While various models, including proton sponge effect/osmotic lysis and membrane destabilization/fusion, have been proposed, none are fully validated or sufficient for guiding rational LNP design. Herein, I reevaluate existing data, presenting strong evidence that LNPs escape the endosomal compartment through the recently discovered vesicle budding-and-collapse (VBC) mechanism. A critical subsequent finding is that endosomal escape triggers the formation of an insoluble lipid/nucleic acid aggregate within the cytoplasm. The slow dissolution of this aggregate emerges as an additional, potentially rate-limiting, bottleneck to functional nucleic acid delivery. By reconciling previously puzzling experimental observations, the VBC mechanism provides a powerful theoretical framework for the rational design of LNPs with enhanced endosomal escape and overall functional delivery efficiencies.

Indexed as

EndosomesLipidsNanoparticlesHumansLipidsdrug deliveryendosomal escapelipid nanoparticlemembrane transportvesicle budding and collapse

Identifiers

PMID41263288
PMCPMC12848894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.