ArticleAIDS (London, England)2026
Antiretroviral utilization and adherence before vs. after expansion of a provincial drug insurance policy.
Article in AIDS (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare antiretroviral therapy (ART) utilization and adherence before and after expansion of a drug coverage program.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted using administrative databases in Saskatchewan, Canada. Beneficiaries with at least one diagnostic claim for HIV infection or AIDS between 1999 and 2021 were eligible. An interrupted time series analysis described trends for three indicators of ART utilization before and after drug coverage expansion in 2018: number of active users (defined by at least one ART claim), number of ART claims, and ART spending. A random-effects logistic regression model, controlling for confounders, was used to evaluate the likelihood of achieving at least 95% adherence measured by the proportion of days covered (PDC) before vs. after coverage expansion.
resultsA total of 519 individuals received at least one ART claim during the study period and met all other inclusion criteria. Time series models detected statistically significant increases in the number of active ART users and ART claims within 4 months following coverage expansion. Corresponding increases in ART spending were offset by decreases over prior years. No statistically significant changes were detected in the likelihood of achieving at least 95% PDC between the pre vs. postcoverage periods (adjusted odds ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval: 0.71-2.25, P = 0.423).
conclusionART coverage expansion was associated with a higher number of claims, more active users, and a change in spending pattern; however, we did not detect a difference in the likelihood of achieving optimal adherence. Addressing additional gaps in HIV management remains a priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.