ReviewCurrent opinion in neurology2026
Acute vertigo: stroke or not?
Review in Current opinion in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of the SMART-BPPV: a multimedia learning module for BPPV education.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Diagnostic challenges in posterior circulation ischemic stroke presenting with acute dizziness and vertigo.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Multiple sclerosis as an under-recognized cause of acute vertigo: clinical and pathophysiologic insights.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewAcute vertigo accounts for about 4% of emergency department visits in both the United States and Europe. Despite this frequency, the management of dizziness, vertigo, and balance disorders remains fragmented, with no established international care pathway. The acute vestibular syndrome (AVS) is particularly challenging, and timely recognition is essential to avoid potentially devastating outcomes. This review is timely, because misdiagnosis rates remain unacceptably high, especially for posterior circulation strokes presenting with dizziness. RECENT
findingsThe literature highlights a wide differential diagnosis for AVS, ranging from benign peripheral vestibular disorders to life-threatening central causes. Distinguishing stroke from peripheral disorder remains a key clinical dilemma, compounded by the limitations of early neuroimaging - MRI can yield false negatives within 48 h. Up to 35% of posterior circulation strokes with dizziness are initially missed, often by nonspecialists unfamiliar with targeted bedside tests. SUMMARY: A structured bedside approach, focusing on key clinical features and targeted examination, can improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce delays in appropriate treatment. Incorporating such strategies into standard practice could address a major gap in acute neurology care and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.