Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41263134›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurology2026

Acute vertigo: stroke or not?

Diego Kaski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Diego KaskiSENSE Research Unit, Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAcute vertigo accounts for about 4% of emergency department visits in both the United States and Europe. Despite this frequency, the management of dizziness, vertigo, and balance disorders remains fragmented, with no established international care pathway. The acute vestibular syndrome (AVS) is particularly challenging, and timely recognition is essential to avoid potentially devastating outcomes. This review is timely, because misdiagnosis rates remain unacceptably high, especially for posterior circulation strokes presenting with dizziness. RECENT

findingsThe literature highlights a wide differential diagnosis for AVS, ranging from benign peripheral vestibular disorders to life-threatening central causes. Distinguishing stroke from peripheral disorder remains a key clinical dilemma, compounded by the limitations of early neuroimaging - MRI can yield false negatives within 48 h. Up to 35% of posterior circulation strokes with dizziness are initially missed, often by nonspecialists unfamiliar with targeted bedside tests. SUMMARY: A structured bedside approach, focusing on key clinical features and targeted examination, can improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce delays in appropriate treatment. Incorporating such strategies into standard practice could address a major gap in acute neurology care and improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

StrokeVertigoAcute DiseaseDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansacute vertigoacute vestibular syndromedizzinessgait ataxialabyrinthine stroke

Identifiers

PMID41263134
PMCPMC12799255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.