ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2025
Sum It Up for Me: A Novel Workshop in the Synthesis of Comprehensive Summary Statements for Pediatric Residents.
Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The ACGME requires progressive monitoring of pediatric trainees' clinical reasoning. Creation of summary statements is a core clinical reasoning skill because it requires learners to prioritize patient information and express their problem representation. There is scarce formal training on the formulation of summary statements for pediatricians. We developed a workshop that provides training in developing summary statements, with the goal of increased knowledge, confidence, and skills in creating summary statements. Methods: The 1-hour workshop consisted of a didactic session and skills practice for creation and evaluation of summary statements. The workshop was assessed for improvement in confidence and knowledge through a pre/post workshop survey and for skills using a previously published rubric. Results: Twenty-four first-year pediatric trainees participated in the session. There was a 33% relative improvement in trainees' confidence in developing and assessing summary statements ( Discussion: Our novel workshop demonstrated improvement in confidence in developing and assessing summary statements, improved knowledge of recommended components of a summary statement, and resulted in a statistically significant improvement in the quality of summary statements. This clinical reasoning workshop improved confidence and objectively assessed crucial clinical reasoning skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.