Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41262924›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in big data2025

Towards the neuromorphic Cyber-Twin: an architecture for cognitive defense in digital twin ecosystems.

Nida Nasir, Hussam Al Hamadi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in big data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nida NasirCOSYS-LEOST Laboratory, Universit Gustave Eiffel, Lille, France.
Hussam Al HamadiCollege of Engineering and IT, University of Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: As cyber-physical systems become increasingly virtualized, digital twins have emerged as essential components for real-time monitoring, simulation, and control. However, their growing complexity and exposure to dynamic network environments make them vulnerable to sophisticated cyber threats. Traditional rule-based and machine-learning-based security models often fail to adapt in real time to evolving attack patterns, particularly in decentralized and resource-constrained settings. Methods: This study introduces the Neuromorphic Cyber-Twin (NCT), a brain-inspired architectural framework that integrates spiking neural networks (SNNs) and event-driven cognition to enhance adaptive cyber defense. The NCT leverages neuromorphic principles such as sparse coding, temporal encoding, and spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) to transform telemetry data from the digital-twin layer into spike-based sensory inputs. A layered cognitive architecture continuously monitors behavioral deviations, infers anomalies, and autonomously adapts its defensive responses in alignment with system dynamics. Results: Lightweight prototype simulations demonstrate the feasibility of NCT-based event-driven anomaly detection and adaptive defense. The results highlight advantages in low-latency detection, contextual awareness, and energy efficiency compared with conventional machine-learning models. Discussion: The NCT framework represents a biologically inspired paradigm for scalable, self-evolving cybersecurity in virtualized ecosystems. Potential applications include infrastructure monitoring, autonomous transportation, and industrial control systems. Comprehensive benchmarking and large-scale validation are identified as future research directions.

Indexed as

adaptive learningcognitive defensecybersecuritydigital twinsevent-driven processingneuromorphic computingspiking neural networksSTDP

Identifiers

PMID41262924
PMCPMC12623207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.