Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41262916›Full record

ArticleOTO open

Medicaid Expansion Status and Receipt of Palliative Care in Stage IV Oral Cavity Cancer.

Rebecca S Arch, Enver Ozer, Amit Agrawal, Catherine T Haring, Stephen Y Kang, Nolan B Seim, Matthew O Old, James W Rocco, Lauren E Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rebecca S ArchDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery The Ohio State University College of Medicine Columbus Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4006-5437
Enver OzerDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery The Ohio State University College of Medicine Columbus Ohio USA.
Amit AgrawalDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery The Ohio State University College of Medicine Columbus Ohio USA.
Catherine T HaringDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery The Ohio State University College of Medicine Columbus Ohio USA.
Stephen Y KangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery The Ohio State University College of Medicine Columbus Ohio USA.
Nolan B SeimDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery The Ohio State University College of Medicine Columbus Ohio USA.
Matthew O OldDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery The Ohio State University College of Medicine Columbus Ohio USA.
James W RoccoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery The Ohio State University College of Medicine Columbus Ohio USA.
Lauren E MillerDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery The Ohio State University College of Medicine Columbus Ohio USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Early and integrated palliative care (PC) interventions are recommended for advanced-stage cancers. The rate with which patients with stage IV oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) receive PC as part of their oncologic care is unknown. We sought to understand the utilization of PC for patients with stage IV OCSCC in Medicaid expanded versus non-expanded states. Study Design: Retrospective cohort. Setting: National Cancer Database was queried for patients with stage IV OCSCC from 2004 to 2017. Methods: Patients in Medicaid expanded (EXP) states were categorized as pre-expansion (pre-EXP) or post-expansion (post-EXP). Patients in nonexpanded states (NEXP) were categorized as diagnosed before 2014 (pre-NEXP) or during/after 2014 (post-NEXP). Multivariable logistic regressions were used to compare receipt of PC among pre-EXP and post-EXP patients, and separately among post-EXP and post-NEXP cases. Results: Among 15,356 patients who met inclusion criteria, 629 (4.10%) received PC. There was a trend towards increased receipt of PC in post-EXP compared to pre-EXP cases, but this did not reach statistical significance. Among pre-EXP and post-EXP cases, patients were more likely to receive PC with the lowest income quartile, tongue cancer as the oral cavity subsite, and no insurance. Conclusion: There was no significant difference of PC receipt for patients with stage IV OCSCC in Medicaid expanded versus non-expanded states. Results among patients in pre-EXP and post-EXP states suggest increased PC use among more disadvantaged patient groups. Further analysis on receipt of PC in vulnerable patient populations with advanced-stage cancer is warranted.

Indexed as

Medicaid expansionoral cancerpalliative

Identifiers

PMID41262916
PMCPMC12626276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.