Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41262826›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Improving Adherence to National Laparoscopic Appendicectomy Documentation Guidelines: A Quality Improvement Project.

Kayden Chahal, Valentina James, Charlotte Rowe, Isobel Thomas, Maro Paroikaki, Ahmed Elnewishy, Ahmed Moustafa, Charlotte Florance, Liam Poynter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kayden ChahalGeneral Surgery, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells, Tunbridge Wells, GBR.
Valentina JamesGeneral Surgery, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells, Tunbridge Wells, GBR.
Charlotte RoweGeneral Surgery, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells, Tunbridge Wells, GBR.
Isobel ThomasGeneral Surgery, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells, Tunbridge Wells, GBR.
Maro ParoikakiGeneral Surgery, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells, Tunbridge Wells, GBR.
Ahmed ElnewishySurgery, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells, Tunbridge Wells, GBR.
Ahmed MoustafaGeneral Surgery, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells, Tunbridge Wells, GBR.
Charlotte FloranceGeneral Surgery, East Sussex Hospital, East Sussex, GBR.
Liam PoynterGeneral Surgery, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells, Tunbridge Wells, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background High-quality operative documentation is critical for clinical communication, patient safety, audit, education, and medico-legal protection. In 2022, the Get It Right First Time (GIRFT) initiative published best practice guidelines for laparoscopic appendicectomy documentation, detailing 44 recommended data points. This study aimed to improve adherence to these standards within a district general hospital through a three-cycle quality improvement project. Materials and methods A Plan-Do-Study-Act methodology was employed across three audit cycles (April 2024, September 2024, and January 2025). All laparoscopic appendicectomy cases meeting the inclusion criteria were assessed using a GIRFT-based audit tool. Interventions included a governance meeting, an in-theatre checklist (post-cycle one), and the introduction of an electronic operative note template aligned with GIRFT guidance (post-cycle two). Data were analyzed descriptively, and percentage improvements between cycles were calculated. Results Fifty-six operation records were analyzed (20 in cycle one, 18 in cycles two and three). Progressive improvements in documentation completeness were observed across most categories, with the most significant gains following electronic template implementation. By cycle three, multiple sub-categories, including appendix details, entry to abdomen, and operative prep, achieved 100% documentation rates (18/18). The only significant decline was in skin preparation documentation (-100%), due to a template omission. Conclusions Structured interventions, particularly an electronic operative note template aligned with GIRFT standards, substantially improved operative documentation quality. These low-cost, scalable changes could be replicated in other centers. Future work should assess long-term sustainability and explore parallel implementation of electronic consent templates.

Indexed as

girft (getting it right first time)laparoscopic appendectomymedical documentationnational guidelinequality improvement (qi)

Identifiers

PMID41262826
PMCPMC12626107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.