Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41262821›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

From Design to Closure: Artificial Intelligence Transforming Clinical Research.

Kanika Vats, Mohammad Mazhar Alam

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kanika VatsDepartment of Research and Innovation, Emirates Classification Society (TASNEEF), Abu Dhabi, ARE.
Mohammad Mazhar AlamDepartment of Laboratory, Disease Prevention Screening Center (DPSC), PureLab, Abu Dhabi, ARE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical research is essential as it advances medical innovation, from developing new treatments and improving existing ones for additional disease indications to creating better processes and the availability of medical devices, yet traditional trial methods are often slow, costly, and full of challenges. Over the past decade, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has evolved across all phases of the clinical research cycle, from study design and planning to initiation, conduct, and closure. This editorial explores how AI can create new opportunities to enhance patient recruitment, optimize trial design, improve dose adherence and participant retention, strengthen safety monitoring, and enable advanced data analysis. It also highlights key challenges associated with the use of AI/ML, including selection bias, privacy, ethical considerations, and regulatory compliance. Since these tools generate outputs based on trained datasets, issues like data drift must be carefully managed to ensure ongoing accuracy and reliability. By recognizing both opportunities and challenges of using AI/ML across all stages of clinical research, we have proposed potential solutions to help overcome these challenges and promote responsible adoption of this new technological era. Responsible deployment and rigorous validation are essential; although hybrid approaches combine AI-driven insights with human oversight, these technologies can improve trial efficiency, improve patient outcomes, and accelerate development of novel therapies, while ensuring that accountability, safety, and ethical integrity remain firmly with humans. This editorial provides a roadmap for integrating responsible use of AI into clinical trials, ensuring ethical integrity, regulatory alignment, and trust, so that AI ultimately strengthens trial outcomes and benefits the patients these studies are designed to serve.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (ai)clinical researchclinical trialdata monitoringdigital healthmachine learningparticipant recruitmentsafety monitoringtrial designtrial efficiency

Identifiers

PMID41262821
PMCPMC12624242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.