Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41262796›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Prevalence of Smartphone Addiction and Its Association With Sleep Quality Among Medical Undergraduates: A Cross-Sectional Study From Eastern India.

Geetika Singh, Saurav Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Geetika SinghCommunity Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shree Guru Gobind Singh Tricentenary University, Gurugram, IND.
Saurav SinghPathology, Kasturba Medical College (KMC) and Hospital, Maharajganj, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmartphones have become indispensable tools, powered in part by artificial intelligence. Medical students are often overburdened and sleep-deprived due to their curricular demands, which is further aggravated by irrational and problematic smartphone usage, adversely affecting their work proficiency and health. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the association of smartphone addiction with the quality of sleep among medical students, along with other background variables like gender, age, year of study, etc.  Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 314 medical students from Netaji Subhas Medical College and Hospital, Patna, using an online self-administered questionnaire consisting of three parts: sociodemographic characteristics, Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS-SV), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to correlate SAS scores and PQSI scores.

resultsThe mean SAS-SV score was 34.01 + 9.78. The prevalence of smartphone addiction was found in 46.2% of females and 57.5% of males. The mean PSQI global score was 7.28 + 3.86. A majority, 209 (66.6%), of students had poor sleep quality as assessed by the PQSI scale. There was a positive correlation between overall PQSI scores and SAS scores (r=0.172, p<0.01). Significant association was also found between the place of residence (p < 0.05) and SAS scores (p < 0.001) with poor sleep quality, respectively.

conclusionExcessive smartphone use was found to be highly prevalent among medical students and significantly associated with poor sleep quality. The findings emphasize the need for awareness and behavioral interventions to promote responsible smartphone usage and improve sleep hygiene among medical undergraduates.

Indexed as

medical studentssleep qualitysmartphonesmartphone addictionundergraduates

Identifiers

PMID41262796
PMCPMC12624815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.