ReviewCureus2025
Intraoperative Hypotension After Neuraxial Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Vasopressors for Cesarean Birth Stratified by Maternal Risk.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Prevention of post-spinal hypotension in high risk cesarean delivery: A systematic review and updated network meta-analysis of prophylactic vasopressor infusions.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postspinal hypotension is a frequent complication during cesarean delivery, particularly in high-risk pregnancies. Although vasopressors are routinely used for its management, their relative efficacy and safety after the onset of hypotension remain uncertain. Following PROSPERO registration (CRD420251050321) and in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, this systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of norepinephrine, phenylephrine, and ephedrine administered for treatment, rather than prophylaxis, of postspinal hypotension during cesarean delivery. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Scopus through April 2025 was performed using a combination of MeSH and free-text terms related to cesarean section, spinal anesthesia, hypotension, and vasopressors. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intravenous bolus or infusion administration of these agents in parturients undergoing high-risk cesarean delivery were included, while prophylactic trials were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Quantitative synthesis was performed using a random-effects model, and subgroup and sensitivity analyses explored potential sources of heterogeneity, with publication bias evaluated via funnel plot asymmetry. Nineteen randomized trials, including 1,715 parturients, met the inclusion criteria. Most studies involved high-risk pregnancies, including preeclampsia, fetal compromise, or emergency cesarean delivery, and were generally rated as low risk of bias. The primary outcome was successful correction of intraoperative postspinal hypotension, and secondary outcomes included maternal bradycardia, nausea, vomiting, requirement for additional vasopressors, and neonatal parameters such as Apgar score <7 at one and five minutes, umbilical artery pH <7.2, and NICU admission. Vasopressors produced non-significant relief of hypotension (relative risk (RR) = 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.90-1.55) with minimal heterogeneity (I² = 6.03%). Subgroup analysis favored norepinephrine over phenylephrine (RR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.01-1.79) and phenylephrine over ephedrine (RR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.11-2.09). Overall, vasopressors demonstrated comparable efficacy in resolving postspinal hypotension, with a modest advantage for norepinephrine. Differences likely reflect variations in dosing and administration protocols. Standardized treatment algorithms and head-to-head comparative trials are needed to identify the optimal vasopressor for managing intraoperative hypotension in high-risk cesarean delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.