ArticleBMJ public health2025
Community-level factors influencing the duration of buprenorphine treatment in individuals with opioid use disorder: a cohort study using US longitudinal claims data.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Buprenorphine is effective in reducing opioid-related morbidity and mortality; however, many patients discontinue treatment prematurely. While previous research has focused on individual-level predictors of retention, the influence of community context remains underexplored. This study aims to examine how community-level factors, such as social vulnerability, availability of buprenorphine-waivered providers and access to behavioural health services, affect the duration of buprenorphine treatment episodes for individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using longitudinal claims data from 2006 to 2022. Adults aged 18 and older who initiated buprenorphine treatment for OUD and maintained continuous enrolment were included. Treatment episodes were defined by refill continuity, monitored until a gap of greater than 14 days occurred. Patient ZIP codes were linked to Social Vulnerability Index scores, provider density and behavioural health facility availability. The primary outcome was treatment duration, classified into short-term (0-3 months), medium-term (3-6 months), extended medium-term (6-12 months) and long-term (>12 months). Associations were identified using stepwise multinomial logistic regression. Results: From the 131 169 individuals (303 528 buprenorphine treatment episodes), most of them were males (60.8%), aged 18-34 years (47.7%), and commercially insured (76.0%). For medium-term duration, individuals living in low-vulnerable areas (OR: 1.14 (1.36-1.47)), with high provider density (1.07 (1.02-1.12)) and high mental health service availability (1.20 (1.15-1.25)) were associated with longer retention. Effect size increased for extended medium-term durations, including low vulnerability (1.73 (1.67-1.80)) and high mental health service availability (1.31 (1.26-1.37)). In long-term treatment episodes, those living in low-vulnerable areas (1.95 (1.89-2.02)), high provider density (1.1 (1.06-1.15)) and high mental health services access (1.58 (1.52-1.64)) presented an increased effect size in the odds. Conclusions: Social vulnerability, provider availability and mental health service access are significantly associated with buprenorphine treatment duration. Addressing these access inequities could improve retention for individuals with OUD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.