Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41262758›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2025

Carbon dot-based polyplexes with cell penetration peptides for gene transfection.

Hani Nasser Abdelhamid, Ülo Langel, Mahmoud M Abdelnaby, Moataz Dowaidar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hani Nasser AbdelhamidDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU) Riyadh 11623 Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3106-8302
Ülo LangelDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University Stockholm 10691 Sweden.
Mahmoud M AbdelnabyInterdisciplinary Research Center for Hydrogen Technologies and Carbon Management, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM) Dhahran 31261 Saudi Arabia moataz.dowaidar@kfupm.edu.sa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3434-8593
Moataz DowaidarInterdisciplinary Research Center for Hydrogen Technologies and Carbon Management, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM) Dhahran 31261 Saudi Arabia moataz.dowaidar@kfupm.edu.sa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6189-3020

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores the synthesis, characterization, and gene-delivery efficacy of polyplexes comprising carbon nanomaterials, namely, graphene oxide quantum dots (GO QDs) and carbon dots (CDs), in conjunction with cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs), namely, PF14 or PF221, alongside gene therapeutic agents (pGL3 plasmids or splice-correcting oligonucleotides (SCO)). GO QDs were created using Hummers' method, followed by acid fragmentation, while CDs were generated by an eco-friendly solvothermal procedure utilizing ascorbic acid as a precursor. Structural and morphological characterization using X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and zeta potential analysis confirmed the synthesis of nanocomplexes with distinct physicochemical properties. Gene transfection assays demonstrated that PF14-CD polyplexes attained superior efficiency in delivering pGL3 and SCO, surpassing GO QDs and PF221-based methods. Mechanistic studies revealed that the cellular uptake of PF14-SCO-CDs is predominantly mediated by scavenger receptor class A (SCARA), as evidenced by the significant inhibition observed with SCARA-specific inhibitors. The use of PF14 and CDs presents a promising model for efficient gene transport, primarily governed by receptor-mediated endocytosis.

Identifiers

PMID41262758
PMCPMC12626635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.