Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41262742›Full record

ArticleGlobal qualitative nursing research

Shaping Group Antenatal Care in Brussels Metropolitan Region: A Descriptive Multi-Case Study.

Florence Talrich, Astrid Van Damme, Hilde L A Bastiaens, Marlies E B Rijnders, Katrien Beeckman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global qualitative nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Florence TalrichVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Jette, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6949-2961
Astrid Van DammeVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Jette, Belgium.
Hilde L A BastiaensUniversiteit Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium.
Marlies E B RijndersTNO, ZL Leiden, The Netherlands.
Katrien BeeckmanVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Jette, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Group Antenatal Care (GANC) provides a person-centred approach to prenatal care, integrating health care delivery with health promotion, while empowering participants and building a sense of community. GANC has proven to be effective and positively experienced by both participants and care providers and is also feasible to implement. However, introducing such innovative care models in a metropolitan city like Brussels involves navigating both challenges and opportunities. This study explores how GANC facilitators implement sessions in Brussels, the extent to which the core components are incorporated, and the rationale behind the chosen approaches. We used a descriptive multiple case study design grounded in constructivism and conducted reflexive thematic analysis. We collected data from four settings offering GANC, including 21 observations of four series of sessions and four in-depth interviews with GANC-facilitators. The findings indicate that settings shape the format of the sessions through the creation of a supportive atmosphere, the structure of content, and the integration of health assessments, which creates the format of the sessions. Furthermore, two key dynamics were identified: participant engagement and interaction, and facilitator responsiveness. Our study demonstrates that the settings can uphold the foundational principles of GANC, while addressing the opportunities and challenges within Brussels' complex urban environment.

Indexed as

BelgiumfeasibilityGroup Antenatal Caremetropolitan citymodel fidelityperson-centred care

Identifiers

PMID41262742
PMCPMC12623657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.