Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41262712›Full record

ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2025

Long-term Functional Outcome and Satisfaction After Surgical Management of Cuboid Fractures.

Esmee W M Engelmann, Jens A Halm, Tim Schepers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Esmee W M EngelmannAmsterdam UMC-Location AMC, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7685-4024
Jens A HalmAmsterdam UMC-Location AMC, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3649-0609
Tim SchepersAmsterdam UMC-Location AMC, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1172-4939

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cuboid fractures are rare, and there is a scarcity in evidence of the long-term functional outcome of these fractures in literature. This study aimed to evaluate functional outcome, complications, quality of life, and patient satisfaction after surgical treatment of cuboid fractures. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at a level 1 trauma center, reviewing patients ≥16 years with cuboid fractures operated between 2014 and 2024. Functional outcome was assessed using the Foot Function Index (FFI), the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot score, and EQ-5D quality of life questionnaire. Complications such as nonunion, infection, and secondary arthrodesis were recorded. Results: The total cohort of surgically managed patients was 45 (28 females and 17 males), with a median age of 39.1 (IQR, 24.2) years and median follow-up of 67.0 (IQR, 91) months. A subset of 42 patients were treated with open reduction and internal fixation within 4 weeks after the injury. Overall, AOFAS was fair to good (median 76, range 34-100) and treatment satisfaction was high (mean 8.7/10, SD 1.1). There were no infections and no cases of nonunion. Secondary calcaneocuboid joint fusion was required in only 2 patients. In multivariate linear regression analysis, the type of fixation (cuboid plate) was significantly associated with better AOFAS ( Conclusion: Surgical intervention aimed at restoring articular congruence and column length with cuboid plate fixation can lead to union with overall fair to good functional outcome and high patient satisfaction. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Indexed as

Chopartcuboidfoot traumafunctional outcomeLisfrancORIF

Identifiers

PMID41262712
PMCPMC12623629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.