ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Perceptions of ultra processed food are associated with strategies for identifying healthy foods in online survey of adults living in Vermont.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Before we tell people to avoid ultra-processed foods, can they identify them? The case for cognitive validity criteria in food classification.Public health nutrition · 2026Article
- Article
- Moving beyond information provision: strengthening structural and outcome-oriented approaches to food security among refugee populations.Public health nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The public health effects of industrial food processing are being widely researched, in response to observational evidence linking ultra processed food (UPF) consumption with a range of poor health outcomes. While there has been global debate regarding whether UPF should be incorporated into dietary guidelines for the public (in addition to existing nutrient recommendations) there is a limited understanding of the degree to which consumers prioritize food processing attributes, relative to nutrient attributes (e.g., sugar, sodium, saturated fat) when making decisions about food and health. This study investigates how perceptions of UPFs relate to the criteria that consumers prioritize when evaluating food healthfulness, including both nutrient-based and non-nutrient-based attributes. Methods: An online survey was conducted in 2022 with a sample of 671 adults residing in a northeastern U.S. state. The survey assessed perceptions of UPFs, including efforts to reduce UPF consumption, and the importance assigned to various nutrient (sugar, fat, sodium, and food groups) and non-nutrient (kitchen ingredients, minimal processing, and production practices) criteria in determining food healthfulness. Demographic variables included age, gender, income, education, race/ethnicity, and presence of children in the household. Multivariate logistic regression analyzed associations between UPF perceptions and healthfulness criteria, reported as adjusted odds ratios (AORs). Results: A slight majority (52%) of respondents were familiar with the term "ultra-processed foods," with awareness significantly higher among females ( Discussion: Findings suggest that perceptions of UPFs shape how consumers define healthy food, with many favoring non-nutrient criteria related to processing and production over conventional nutrient profiles. This shift in consumer perspective highlights the importance of incorporating processing-related information into public health communication and food labeling strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.