ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Knowledge, attitude, and practice status of ovarian reserve function among women of childbearing age: a latent profile analysis.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: We aimed to explore the current status and latent profiles of knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) on ovarian reserve function among women of childbearing age and to identify the factors associated with these profiles. Methods: Using convenience sampling, women of reproductive age in the Hangzhou area of China were enrolled as study participants between March and May 2025. Data were collected using a demographic questionnaire and an ovarian reserve KAP instrument. A latent profile analysis was conducted on the ovarian reserve function KAP, and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to explore the influencing factors of different profiles. Results: A total of 333 women of reproductive age were included in the study. The ovarian reserve function KAP score was 55.00 ± 7.06 points, the knowledge dimension score was 9.23 ± 1.59 points, the attitude dimension score was 27.58 ± 3.74 points, and the practice dimension score was 18.19 ± 2.93 points. The data were divided into three latent profiles: high knowledge-high attitude-high practice type (39.04%), high knowledge-moderate attitude-moderate practice type (38.74%), and low knowledge-low attitude-low practice type (22.22%). Multivariate analysis identified age, occupation, and production history were factors influencing the different latent profiles of the ovarian reserve function KAP. Conclusion: The KAP on ovarian reserve function among women of childbearing age is at an intermediate level and exhibits significant variability across different groups. Relevant educators and healthcare professionals should develop personalized intervention plans tailored to the specific characteristics and influencing factors of each group to enhance overall KAP, thereby safeguarding reproductive health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.