Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41262680›Full record

ArticleNanotechnology, science and applications2025

Guiding Cell Growth: Graphene-Patterned Polymeric Substrates for Enhanced Tissue Proliferation.

Weronika Sosnowicz, Jakub Krzeminski, Jan Dominiczak, Dominik Baraniecki, Paulina Trzaskowska, Marta C Corvo, Zuzanna Żołek-Tryznowska, Arkadiusz Jeznach, Malgorzata Jakubowska, Lucja Dybowska-Sarapuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanotechnology, science and applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Aerosol Jet Printing in Biotechnologies.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Weronika SosnowiczFaculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, 02-524, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4568-6029
Jakub KrzeminskiCentre for Advanced Materials and Technologies CEZAMAT, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, 02-822, Poland.
Jan DominiczakFaculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, 02-524, Poland.
Dominik BaranieckiFaculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, 02-524, Poland.
Paulina TrzaskowskaCentre for Advanced Materials and Technologies CEZAMAT, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, 02-822, Poland.
Marta C CorvoDepartment of Materials Science, CENIMAT|i3N, School of Science and Technology, NOVA University, Caparica, 2829-516, Portugal.
Zuzanna Żołek-TryznowskaFaculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, 02-524, Poland.
Arkadiusz JeznachFaculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, 02-524, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4308-4158
Malgorzata JakubowskaFaculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, 02-524, Poland.
Lucja Dybowska-SarapukFaculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, 02-524, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5715-0937

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In tissue engineering, there is a growing need for patient-specific strategies that enable precise control of cellular behaviour - such as adhesion, proliferation, and migration - to enhance tissue integration and reduce transplant rejection. Engineering the physicochemical properties and topography of substrates is a promising way to guide cell responses. Among available materials, graphene nanoplatelets offer outstanding physicochemical, electrical, and mechanical properties, making them ideal for biomedical use. Moreover, printed electronics techniques allow efficient, cost-effective fabrication of continuous coatings or intricate micropatterns on flexible substrates. Methods: Graphene nanoplatelet patterns were fabricated on flexible thermoplastic polyurethane substrates using inkjet and aerosol jet printing to compare the methods and their influence on cell behaviour. Layers were analysed for morphology, topography, and electrical properties (SEM, Raman spectroscopy, profilometry, electrical measurements). Surface wettability and surface free energy were measured via contact angle measurements. L929 fibroblast cells were cultured on printed patterns and assessed by confocal microscopy and MTT assay. Results and Discussion: Graphene patterns significantly improved cell proliferation compared to TPU controls. Cells aligned and migrated along printed graphene features, especially on aerosol jet-printed patterns, which promoted attachment and spreading. Quantitative analysis confirmed enhanced cell coverage and proliferation, highlighting the potential of graphene micropatterns for precise cellular control in regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

aerosol jet printingcell guidancegraphene nanoplateletsgraphene patterningink-jet printingtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID41262680
PMCPMC12625733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.