Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41262654›Full record

ArticleCogent mental health2024

Adopting the principles and practices of learning health systems in universities and colleges: recommendations for delivering actionable data to improve student mental health.

Emma Broglia, Michael Barkham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cogent mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emma BrogliaDepartment of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2137-8187
Michael BarkhamClinical and Applied Psychology Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1687-6376

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite efforts to address the growing severity and complexity of student mental health issues, challenges persist in data quality and application, thereby hindering progress. This article is built upon three decades of cumulative expertise from the authors, complemented by insights gathered through the extensive observations of students and practitioners within the realm of student mental health. Drawing from both robust evidence and hands-on experience, it presents evidence-based recommendations aimed at enhancing data capture and utilization in alignment with the principles and methodologies of learning health systems. The approach is based on four interconnected themes: (1) Learning from global insights on university students' mental health; (2) Measuring, monitoring, and managing data; (3) Involving student and stakeholder perspectives; and (4) Mapping transitions, access, and systems for student mental health services. These themes encompass both the individual student journey and the broader organizational layers of universities and colleges. Ten recommendations are made for supporting universities and colleges to move towards adopting the principles of learning health systems to support students' mental health.

Indexed as

learning health systemsMental healthoutcome measuresservice user involvementstudents

Identifiers

PMID41262654
PMCPMC12443003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.