ArticleRevista brasileira de ortopedia2025
National Survey to Evaluate the Approach to ACL Injuries among Brazilian Sports Surgeons.
Article in Revista brasileira de ortopedia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To describe the profile of Brazilian knee surgeons and their preferences in the diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, and to compare the findings with data from the current literature. Methods: We conducted an electronic survey among surgeons who were members of the Brazilian Society of Arthroscopy and Sports Traumatology (Sociedade Brasileira de Artroscopia e Traumatologia Esportiva, SBRATE, in Portuguese). The study included 746 orthopedic surgeons with registered email addresses. We sent a message with an invitation to participate, the research objectives, and a link to access the questionnaire, which contained 36 questions about the professional profile of the surgeons and their preferences in the diagnosis, surgical technique, and rehabilitation of ACL injuries. Results: The number of participants was 170 (22.7% of the 746 orthopedic surgeons invited). All participants performed ACL reconstruction, with 72% having more than 10 years of experience and 43.5% performing more than 50 reconstructions per year. Sports trauma was the most common injury mechanism (95%). Instability (95.3%) and return to sport (82.2%) were the main criteria for surgical indication. Most participants (53.5%) indicated surgery 1 to 4 weeks after injury. Flexor grafting (88.2%) and the in-out transportal technique (39.2%) were the most frequent options. The predominant postoperative approaches were immediate weight-bearing (51.8%) and early full range of motion (61.3%). Conclusion: The study outlined the profile and practices of SBRATE knee surgeons in ACL reconstruction. Our findings demonstrate that Brazilian practices follow global trends described in the recent literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.