ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Rapid visual engagement in neural processing of detailed touch interactions.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comprehensive EEG dataset for investigating visual touch perception.Scientific data · 2026Article
- The Validated Touch-Video Database.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Touch perception is an inherently multisensory process in which vision plays an essential role. However, our understanding of how vision encodes sensory and emotional-affective aspects of observed touch, and the timing of these processes, remains limited. To address this gap, we investigated the neural dynamics of visual touch perception using electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings from participants who viewed videos depicting detailed tactile hand interactions from the Validated Touch-Video Database. We examined how the brain encodes basic body cues, such as hand orientation and viewing perspective, in addition to sensory aspects, including the type of touch (e.g., stroking vs. pressing; hand vs. object touch) and the object involved (e.g., knife, brush), as well as emotional-affective dimensions. Using multivariate decoding, we found that information about body cues emerged within approximately 60 ms, with information about sensory details and valence emerging around 110-160 ms, demonstrating efficient early visual encoding. Information about arousal, threat, and pain was most clearly identified by approximately 260 ms, suggesting that such evaluations require slightly extended neural engagement. Frequency decoding revealed that body cues were processed across a broad spectral range, with strongest contributions in the theta, alpha, and low beta bands (~6-20 Hz), while sensory and emotional-affective features were primarily reflected in delta, theta, and alpha frequencies (~1-13 Hz). Our findings reveal that bottom-up, automatic visual processing is integral to complex tactile assessments, important for rapidly extracting both the personal relevance and the sensory and emotional dimensions of visually observed touch.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.