ArticleDEN open2026
A Clinical Scoring Model to Predict Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis in Biliary Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Patients With Intact Papilla: A Large Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in DEN open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive factors and nomogram for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) needs to be predicted in order to take adequate preventive measures in individual cases. The aim of this study was to develop a clinical prediction rule for PEP in biliary ERCP for patients with intact papilla. Methods: We conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study to investigate the adverse events of biliary ERCP in patients with intact papilla. A total of 3739 patients were prospectively enrolled at 36 hospitals in western Japan between April 2017 and March 2018. Data on patient-related factors, operator-related factors, procedure-related factors, and preventative measures were collected. A multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors for PEP, and a scoring model was developed. Results: The scoring model included 11 factors: age younger than 50 years (2 points), female sex (1 point), ASA 3 (-2 points), cholangitis (-1 point), hypoamylasemia (-1 point), obstruction of the main pancreatic duct at the pancreatic head (-2 points), cannulation time >20 min (1 point), guidewire insertion into the pancreatic duct (3 points), intraductal ultrasonography (1 point), biopsy (1 point), and total procedure time >60 min (2 points). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of this model was 0.729. All cases were stratified into three groups according to the total score: low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups, with an incidence of PEP of 1.6%, 6.0%, and 17.7%, respectively. Conclusions: This scoring model stratified the risk of PEP in individual ERCP cases with intact papilla fairly well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.