Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41262510›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2025

Sheathless delivery of a transfemoral pulsatile left ventricular assist device for high-risk percutaneous interventions: a case series.

Edoardo Elia, Marcelo B Bastos, Demarchi Andrea, Giovanni La Malfa, Pistis Gianfranco, Giuseppe Patti, Gabriella Dallaglio, Gioel Gabrio Secco

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Edoardo EliaInterventional Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Via Venezia 16, Alessandria 15121, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3877-9323
Marcelo B BastosDepartment of Interventional Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr Molenwaterplein 40, 3015GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2269-8983
Demarchi AndreaInterventional Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Via Venezia 16, Alessandria 15121, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7748-1389
Giovanni La MalfaInterventional Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Via Venezia 16, Alessandria 15121, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8197-3175
Pistis GianfrancoDivision of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Via Venezia 16, Alessandria 15121, Italy.
Giuseppe PattiDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, via Solaroli, 17 - 28100 Novara, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5404-3968
Gabriella DallaglioDivision of Cardiology, University of Parma, Parma I43100, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0487-2397
Gioel Gabrio SeccoInterventional Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Via Venezia 16, Alessandria 15121, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9998-7049

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) can reduce adverse events in patients with severely impaired left ventricular (LV) function and precarious haemodynamics during complex cardiovascular procedures. Despite numerous benefits, MCS requires large-bore access, which increases the risks of vascular complications. The iVAC2L (PulseCath BV, Arnhem, The Netherlands) provides up to 2.0 L/min output using pulsatile flow and is an effective tool for LV unloading, but requires a large-bore sheath (18 Fr). Case summary: We describe four cases of sheathless insertion of iVAC2L during high-risk cardiovascular interventions. Two cases consisted in high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions, and two other cases were transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair. All cases were successful, and no adverse events could be observed. Discussion: The sheathless approach requires an 11% smaller arteriotomy. This case series aims to display how the iVAC2L catheter can be deployed without a sheath to minimize access size in a safe and feasible manner and proposes a structured approach to its deployment. When performed in selected patients, this strategy may reduce vascular complications. Conclusion: Sheathless introduction of iVAC2L was feasible and safe safely deployed in selected cases of coronary and structural interventions. Larger studies are necessary to further define its impact on event rates.

Indexed as

BleedingCase reportInterventionaliVAC2LMechanical circulatory supportPercutaneous coronary interventionPulseCathSheathlessVascular complications

Identifiers

PMID41262510
PMCPMC12626125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.