Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41262496›Full record

ArticlePolish journal of radiology2025

Relationship between different techniques and complications in CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsies: a single-centre comprehensive analysis CT-guided lung biopsy: techniques and associated complications.

Bünyamin Korkmaz, Halil İbrahim Şara, Süleyman Bakdık

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bünyamin KorkmazUniversity of Health Sciences, Beyhekim Education and Research Hospital, Konya, Turkey.
Halil İbrahim ŞaraUniversity of Health Sciences, Beyhekim Education and Research Hospital, Konya, Turkey.
Süleyman BakdıkNecmettin Erbakan University, Faculty of Medicine, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between different techniques, lesion characteristics, and the development of pneumothorax (Ptx), chest tube-requiring Ptx, and type 1 parenchymal contusion (T1PC) in computed tomography-guided transthoracic lung biopsies (CTTB). Material and methods: This retrospective study included 510 patients who underwent CTTB between 2015 and 2020. Patients were classified according to needle system (coaxial (Cx)/non-coaxial (NCx)), needle gauge, use of autologous blood clot (OBC), lesion size, location, approach path, pleural puncture count, number of specimens, and presence of emphysema along the needle tract. Complications were assessed with post-procedural CT. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: Ptx was more frequent in males, in the presence of emphysema along the needle tract, with middle lobe lesions, lateral approach, ≥ 3 pleural passes, ≥ 3 samples, and when using 18G NCx or 19G Cx needles. OBC use reduced Ptx risk. Chest tube-requiring Ptx was significantly associated with ≥ 3 pleural passes, ≥ 3 samples, and 19G Cx needles. T1PC was most common with 17G Cx needle use and when ≥ 3 samples were obtained. Multivariate analysis showed that 18G NCx and 19G Cx needles reduced T1PC risk, while the absence of Ptx increased its likelihood. Conclusion: In CT-guided lung biopsies, complication risk can be reduced by optimizing technique, limiting pleural punctures and specimen numbers, and considering OBC use, needle gauge, and patient-specific factors.

Indexed as

autologous blood clotcomplicationsCT-guided biopsylung biopsypneumothorax

Identifiers

PMID41262496
PMCPMC12624500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.