ArticleMachine learning. Health2025
Real-time quality feedback on Doppler data for community midwives using edge-AI.
Article in Machine learning. Health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents a technical framework for real-time fetal Doppler data quality assessment using deep learning and edge-AI, designed to improve data collection and support future clinical studies in low-resource settings. Integrated into a low-cost, edge-computing system co-designed with Indigenous midwives in rural Guatemala, our solution utilizes an Android phone for data acquisition and decision support. Retrospective analysis demonstrates the potential to detect fetal growth restriction, hypertension, and other pregnancy-related conditions using Doppler-based fetal cardiac signals. To ensure accurate assessments and provide immediate feedback, a real-time signal quality metric is essential. We analyzed two fetal Doppler datasets: 191 recordings, captured in rural Guatemala, for training and validation, and five captured in a German hospital (in Leipzig) for testing. The data were segmented into 3.75 s intervals, and categorized into five quality levels: good, poor, radiofrequency interference, talking, and silent. A deep neural network was trained on these segments, achieving a micro
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.